Abogado.com The #1 website in Spanish on consumer legal issues LawInfo.com Nationwide Attorney Directory and Legal Consumer Resources n. determine a question of fact essential to a decision in a case by the trial judge (jury or non-jury judge) after a trial (contribution) to a decision in a case, often referred to as findings of fact. A finding of fact is different from a legal finding, which is established by the judge as the sole legal expert. There is no need to draw findings of fact and legal conclusions if they are quashed or not requested by litigators, leaving only the simple judgment on the merits. (See: Legal Conclusion) Are you a lawyer? Visit our professional website » FindLaw.com Free and reliable legal information for consumers and lawyers The FindLaw legal dictionary – free access to more than 8260 definitions of legal terms. Search for a definition or browse our legal glossaries. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the leading source of free legal information and resources on the Internet. Contact us. Copyright © 2022, Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. Attorneys with exclusive Super Lawyers rating Source: Merriam-Webster`s Dictionary of Law ©1996. Licensed with Merriam-Webster, Incorporated.
Supported by Black`s Law Dictionary, Free 2nd ed., and The Law Dictionary. ConditionsDisclaimerCookiesDo not sell my information (n) Findings of fact are the decisions, opinions or observations of a judge or jury on matters of fact that are submitted to the court for decision. The establishment of the facts ultimately influences the judgment. The result of jury or court deliberations. Decision on a question of fact rendered following a judicial inquiry or an inquest conducted by a court, jury, adjudicator, coroner, etc. A statement of the established facts. The word usually refers to the result obtained by a judge or jury. Decision on a question of fact rendered following a judicial inquiry or an inquest conducted by a court, jury, adjudicator, coroner, etc.
Getroffen wurde. Williams v. Giblin, 86Wis. 648. 57 N. W. 1111; Rhodes gegen United States Bank, 66 Fed. 514, 13 C. C. A.
612.34 L. R. A. 742.
